Courtlistener9 June 2026 Case Updates
Some real clusters
Back to our regularly scheduled programming today, as I've learned my lesson and saved drafts of the article along the way.
Industry News
Summit Law has launched, offering DCR-only services for <$1,000 and promising half off for losses. It was unclear at press time how the actual District Court felt about the subtitle on Summit's logo.
If you have legal industry news tips or are interested in placing an ad in future (better and longer) editions of CourtListener, DM budgetmich on Discord.
Now onto the cases.
District Court
Oakridge Credit Line v. ZombieBro, Dkt pending.
This loan default lawsuit features a bit of an odd claim for relief that seems to be just a reformulated prayer for relief. We'll see how the court handles this and the interjection of random citizen Gooseguy1934.
Counsel: tjaisnice for plaintiff Oakridge Credit Line
Barclays v. ZombieBro, Dkt pending
ZombieBro failed to pay yet another lender. At least this lawsuit is better formed. Gooseguy's down in the replies yet again, still without any judge's permission. For any non-lawyers observing, compare this case with the above. It's hard to imagine a clearer illustration of the importance of retaining good counsel.
Counsel: 00f3 for Plaintiff Barclays
Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank, 2026 DCR 29.
This complex lawsuit against the Federal Reserve Board over its alleged failure to comply with a freedom of information request is under new management. Justice Matthew100x has taken over and asked for a brief status filing to get him up to speed. We'll hold off on a thorough description of the discover battles until the parties file their status briefs, but suffice it to say they've been contentious so far.
Counsel: Franciscus for plaintiff Multiman155; Attorney General Superwoops for defendant FRB
mani-mincraft v. KukkiNekko, 2026 DCR 64.
In today's object lesson in the comparative ease of litigating a well-argued case, defendants have had to object twice to the plaintiff's improperly labeled evidence. Justice Matthew100x already struck the plaintiff's attempt to enter supplemental evidence and denied defendant's objection to that evidence as moot. Defendant asked the court to also strike plaintiff's "Google Doc Evidence" as improperly labeled. The Court has moved the case to discovery, but we'll be watching to see what happens with this objection.
Counsel: Le9endz for plaintiff mani-minecraft; J-The-Fae and Johnes of Theory, Talion, & Partners for defendant KukkiNekko
benmine9 v. PixelGuyYT, Dkt pending.
This complaint totally skips a claim for relief and instead throws the Assault claim straight into the statement of facts (there is no additional narrative). The prayer for relief is wanting, too, even listing emotional distress damages. To plaintiff's credit, they literally turned up yesterday, filing a lawsuit the same day they hopped on the forums.
Counsel: benmine 9, pro se
kisskissy v. stellar-night, Dkt pending.
This well-pleaded complaint comes from a lawyer who's only been around a week, proving youth and ignorance go not hand-in-hand. The lawsuit alleges defendant killed plaintiff, took the bundle that was in plaintiff's hand, then sold the bundle. Plaintiff seeks compensatory and nominal damages.
Counsel: MaxvEtten for plaintiff kisskissy
zinfern275 v. Commonwealth of Redmont, Dkt pending.
AKA how not to plead a tort and appeal a summary offense. Judge Muggy21 is confused, as are we. Here's hoping we get some clarity soon.
Counsel: lolbruh6 for plaintiff zinfern275
Federal Court
Defendants' closing statement was filed yesterday. This case is a real mess tied up in a bunch of deportations and involves unwinding a number of interests in a series of plots. If we'd been around when the initial lawsuit was filed, you have our word we'd have given you blow-by-blow coverage. But we weren't, and we only want to provide high-quality, clear legal coverage. So, we have made the editorial decision not to offer continuing coverage of intermediate proceedings. When there's a ruling, we'll present it. Until then, slogging through the forums is left as an exercise for the reader.
Counsel: Yes
That's all for today! Come back tomorrow for the latest updates from these and all Redmont's cases.